Public research report

The Website Quality Report

A scan of 15,542 public websites found widespread issues in performance, mobile experience, accessibility, structure, and overall site quality.

Executive summary

What this report shows

Most business owners judge a website by how it looks.

This report looks at the parts they usually cannot see: performance, mobile experience, accessibility, structure, and overall site quality.

The scan does not prove why any individual website performed poorly. It does not prove who built the site, what was paid for it, or whether the site produces business.

It does show a broad pattern: many public websites are missing or underperforming on basic quality signals that affect how fast they load, how well they work on mobile, how accessible they are, and how structurally healthy they appear.

Key findings

What the scan found

Most business owners judge a website by how it looks. But the parts that affect speed, usability, accessibility, search visibility, and structure are usually hidden. This report looks under the surface.

15,542 public websites scanned
99.68% of completed scans scored below 90
60 average overall Site Score
7 sec average load time
77.74% had at least one accessibility issue
63.15% had a mobile score under 70

Overall quality

Site Score distribution

Completed scans were concentrated between 50 and 70. Very few completed scans reached the highest scoring range.

Only 49 out of 15,541 completed scans reached a Site Score of 90 or higher.
Failed Scan Critical Poor Needs Work Fair Good
Site Score distribution across scan results
Score range Websites Share Distribution
Failed Scan 1 -
0-30Critical 128 0.82%
30.01-40Critical 673 4.33%
40.01-50Poor 1,949 12.54%
50.01-60Poor 4,761 30.64%
60.01-70Needs Work 5,305 34.14%
70.01-80Needs Work 2,262 14.56%
80.01-90Fair 426 2.74%
90.01-100Good 37 0.24%

Performance

Load time distribution

Load time was one of the clearest issues in the completed scan results. The average measured load time was 7 seconds.

62.60% of completed scans took more than 5 seconds to load.

25.38% took 10 seconds or longer.

Under 5 seconds 5-10 seconds 10+ seconds
Load time distribution for completed scans
Load time Websites Share Distribution
Under 2 seconds 1,882 12.11%
2-3 seconds 1,125 7.24%
3-5 seconds 2,792 17.97%
5-10 seconds 5,799 37.32%
10+ seconds 3,943 25.38%

Accessibility

Accessibility issue distribution

Accessibility issues were common in the point-in-time scan results. These measurements identify detectable issues, not the complete lived experience of every visitor.

77.74% of completed scans had at least one accessibility issue.

21.96% had 10 or more accessibility issues.

0 issues 1-5 issues 6-10 issues 11-20 issues 21+ issues
Accessibility issue counts for completed scans
Detected issues Websites Share Distribution
0 issues 3,444 22.18%
1-5 issues 6,737 43.40%
6-10 issues 2,260 14.56%
11-20 issues 1,778 11.45%
21+ issues 1,306 8.41%

Mobile and structure

Hidden quality signals were consistently weak

Mobile experience and structure health are separate from visual design. These measures help describe whether pages are fast, readable, and technically sound.

63.15%

Mobile score under 70

9,814 completed scans had a mobile score below 70.

31.68%

Structure health under 70

4,924 completed scans had structure health below 70.

4,026

Performance score under 70

Performance gaps can exist even when a website looks acceptable on the surface.

Critical Poor Needs Work Fair Good
Structure health distribution for completed scans
Structure health range Websites Share Distribution
0-30Critical 0 0.00%
30.01-50Poor 944 6.10%
50.01-70Needs Work 4,346 28.07%
70.01-90Fair 10,153 65.59%
90.01-100Good 40 0.26%

Methodology

How to read the results

This dataset summarizes a point-in-time scan of 15,542 public websites. Scores should not be interpreted as permanent fixed values. Live website measurements can change due to server response, network conditions, third-party scripts, redirects, caching, temporary outages, and site updates.

Read the full methodology

Downloads

Download the dataset and supporting files

Download links point to source workbook exports in assets/data/, including a public dataset with business names and phone numbers removed.